critique of art

Jackson Pollock PRIMITIVE SCHIZOPHRENIC SPILLING OF COLOR ON CANVAS Although this man was characterized as an artist, to the sorrow of all lovers of  Pollock's work and life work, he was not an artist. His works do not represent something that could be characterized as an art. His works do not represent something that could be characterized as an great work... What he claims, like many historians, theorists, and others, is: there is some primitive anger and that forced man to throw him out on his canvas. B ut that primal anger in man is not a "message of God" that should be translated into art, and what we see on his canvases does not carry any metaphor. As far as civilization, we have allowed such a fall, believing that it is actually an spiritual elevation. If art no longer speaks of the most intriguing ideas of man, then man will no longer exist, then Pollock and other cultural destroyers are a clear sign of human degradation. His work should not ...

 Dante Gabriel Rossetti FAKE ROMANTICISM OR EXCESSIVE FAIRY TALE Prosepine (1874) Dante Gabriel Rossetti Tate Britain At first glance, we see the beauty of Rossetti's paintings, nothing is missing, everything is perfection but on the other hand we realize that everything is basically a shell without depth, a beautiful bottle per perfume but empty! The painting of Proserpine, everything is perfectly painted, but there is a mistake of a "superficiality" girl, only her hair points us to some character and personality, her face seem to be of plastic. Art attracts us by asking the question, it's missing here, because the artist has tried too hard to show us the god's origins of  Proserpine. Unfortunately, he just pushed to us a fake perfection into the face. A background without a girl can be an ideal painting.  Other Rossetti's paintings such as Paolo and Francesca da Rimini and The Wedding of St George and Princess Sabra all poi...