Jackson Pollock

PRIMITIVE SCHIZOPHRENIC SPILLING OF COLOR ON CANVAS

Although this man was characterized as an artist, to the sorrow of all lovers of  Pollock's work and life work, he was not an artist.

His works do not represent something that could be characterized as an art. His works do not represent something that could be characterized as an great work... What he claims, like many historians, theorists, and others, is: there is some primitive anger and that forced man to throw him out on his canvas. But that primal anger in man is not a "message of God" that should be translated into art, and what we see on his canvases does not carry any metaphor.

As far as civilization, we have allowed such a fall, believing that it is actually an spiritual elevation.

If art no longer speaks of the most intriguing ideas of man, then man will no longer exist, then Pollock and other cultural destroyers are a clear sign of human degradation.

His work should not be discussed "what the artist wanted to say", he did not mean to say anything or he wanted to convince us that we humans are only primitive, evil, corrupted, beings, without exquisite ideas and without proper parameters for good, nice, wise.

STOP linking abnormal things with art.

If there is still common sense, logical conclusion, a clean feeling needs to fight the degradation of culture and man.